Monday, June 10, 2013

No Safe Harbor























Reviewed by James L. Thane
Four out of five stars


This is another excellent psychological crime novel from Tana French. In this case the book features another member of the Dublin Murder Squad, Mick "Scorcher" Kennedy, who first appeared in a minor role in French's last book, Faithful Place.

Kennedy has the best solve rate on the squad. He's the star, and thus when a particularly brutal homicide occurs, Mick is assigned to the case. He's also teamed with a new young partner, Richie Curran, and, in addition to catching a killer, he's expected to show Richie the ropes and make a real detective out of him.

The case itself is a stomach-turner: a young family has been attacked; the father and two children are dead, and the mother is in intensive care, barely clinging to life. The scene is as desolate as can be imagined: a new seaside housing estate outside of Dublin named Brianstown that was only partially completed when the recession hit Ireland with full force and brought development to a screeching halt.

Mick and Richie arrive on the scene, out in the middle of nowhere, to find a scattered group of luxury houses, half of which sit unfinished and only a few of which are occupied. The victims, the Spain family, had been among the first to move in, enticed by the glossy brochures that promised a beautiful, luxurious lifestyle by the sea.

It didn't quite turn out that way, and the Spains are victims of the economic collapse twice over. They're trapped is this failing housing development and Pat Spain, the husband, father and sole breadwinner in the family, has lost his job in the downturn. Things have been very rough and getting worse for the Spains over the last several months, and the evidence initially suggests that Pat Spain may have gone over the edge, killed his children and attempted to murder his wife before taking his own life.

But it soon becomes apparent that there's a lot more going on here than may have initially appeared, and some very strange, seemingly inexplicable things have been going on recently in the life of this family. It's a very unsettling case, especially for Mick Kennedy, who has his own memories of this setting by the sea.

Back before the developers bought the property and renamed it Brianstown, the place was known as Broken Harbor, and Mick's family spent a couple of weeks there every summer until a tragedy struck the family. The repercussions of that event are still reverberating through Kennedy's life as he tackles this current tragic case, and the combination of the two incidents may be enough to overwhelm even the superstar of the Dublin Murder Squad.

French has created here another cast of unforgettable characters, both among the family members who are the victims of the crime and the detectives who must attempt to solve it. For all his confidence, Mick Kennedy is a deeply troubled man and French will push him to the very limit. Beyond the case itself, this book also vividly conveys the havoc unleashed by the economic collapse and the consequences it produced for so many innocent victims.

One thinks of a harbor as a place of refuge, as a place where you can breathe a deep sigh of relief as you arrive home safely from a long journey. Sadly though, this Broken Harbor is anything but a place of refuge, and the people who find themselves there are anything but safe.

The Forbes 25 Reviewers - #16 Bird Brian

Today's guest is Bird Brian's Ghost.

How did you discover Goodreads?In December 2008, I got an email from a high school friend I hadn’t heard from since1987, inviting me to Facebook. It didn’t take me long to get bored of FB, but I discovered the link to GoodReads there, and found GR much more interesting; I was an active user from December 2008 to April 2013.

What have been your most memorable Goodreads experiences?My most memorable GR experience was probably the Celebrity Deathmatch series which Manny started, and which lasted a few months in the autumn and winter of 2011. It’s basically pitting books against each other in reviews, and competing with other reviewers to win more votes for which book you think should win. Obviously it is pretty subjective and not very meaningful to say that, say 1984 should “win” in a confrontation with Macbeth, but it was a lot of fun, and some of the reviews people came up with were very imaginative and entertaining. Another great memory was the long strings of puns that Karen, Eh!, Mariel, Ian Graye and I would into with each other. That was fun too. I remember once I was trying to come up with more puns, when my wife called me to dinner. I sat at the dinner table, absorbed, and she thought there was something serious going on. She asked me, “Hey, what are you thinking about? Is there something going on at work?” and I had to admit “No, I’m just trying really hard to think of a horse-themed pun.” She’s a woman with a lot of patience.

Name one reviewer not in the Forbes 25 that people should be aware of.There are a lot of great reviewers who go unnoticed on the Forbes list. If I had to pick just one, I would name David Kowalski, who is a gifted and insightful writer. He would probably be on the Forbes list, but for the fact he’s deleted his account several times in fits of tortured artistic melodrama. He and Ceridwen were tied for having the most reviews in my reviews “Hall of Fame”. I would also like to mention my friend Ian Graye, who has very in-depth analyses, as well as Eric_W Welch, who has distinguished himself as an extraordinary reviewer of historical nonfiction. The Top Lists on GR are not designed to recognize a talent like that, but that’s their failing; not his.

What was your initial reaction to Amazon buying Goodreads?Well, obviously I wasn’t happy, since it inspired me to greatly reduce my presence on GoodReads. To me, the acquisition was an unwanted step towards further centralization and oligopoly –both of book sales, as well as of moderated online platforms for discussing books. I really like what you and some friends have put together on Shelfinflicted, by the way.

One thing the Amazon acquisition wasn’t –was a surprise. Coincidentally, I had made a group poll for some friends just a few days before the news came out, asking them what they thought GR would be like 10 years from now. Most respondents thought it would be about the same. I included choices of it being bought out by Facebook or by Amazon, but those didn’t get many votes.

How many books do you own?I would roughly estimate I have between 1000 and 1500 physical books laying around my home, including some which are not easily accessible, since they’re in boxes in my storage space. Then I have another 300-400 on Kindle (yeah, I’ve got an Amazon product- it’s from a time I was less sensitized to Amazon). That seems like a lot of books, when I see it written here. It is doubtful I’ll ever be able to read them all. I’m either very ambitious, or a very impulsive bookbuyer. Actually some of those were gifts. Also, some of them have already been read, so maybe the absolute numbers without further breakdown are a poor indicator of anything.

Who is your favorite author?These “who are your favorite” questions always kill me, because they force unnatural comparisons between genres and styles. How can I compare the incisive historical analysis of Edward Gibbon or Carroll Quigley with the storytelling of Honore Balzac or Charles Dickens? Or the humor of Woody Allen and Joseph Heller, with the imaginative worldbuilding of Tolkien, or with the paranoid musings of Philip K. Dick? I love David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest differently than I love Shakespeare’s Macbeth, you know? I guess I’m being difficult here… sorry about that. I won’t get any points for originality here, but I guess I’d have to name Shakespeare as my favorite fiction author, both for the number of his works that I admire, and the high regard I hold him in. Is that stuck up to say? Philip K. Dick, Joseph Heller, Douglas Adams and James Michener (that's right- haters can kiss my ass) would also be on my list.

Carroll Quigley and Allan Bullock would be my current favorite nonfiction authors.

What is your favorite book of all time?My favorite book of all time? Again, that’s so tough. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about this, and I keep coming back to the same few titles: The Brothers Karamazov- F. Dostoyevsky; Tragedy & Hope- Carroll Quigley;Infinite Jest- David Foster Wallace; Lost Illusions- H. Balzac; The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire- E. Gibbon; 1984- George Orwell; and Brave New World- Aldous Huxley. If you made me pick the most favoritest there, it would probably just be arbitrary, and I’d change my mind in 5 minutes.

What are your thoughts on ebooks?Usually I prefer paper and ink over electronic screens, but there is no denying the convenience of travelling with a compact e-reader, instead of lugging around a pile of heavy books. I also prefer reading newspapers and magazines on e-reader, because they don’t clutter up my house and they don’t create a lot of waste. So there is definitely a place for e-readers in my (imagined) “perfect world”. When I was a med student, we had to carry around cumbersome references like The Washington Manual with us on the wards. I would have loved an e-reader for that. I’m sure it has completely changed the experience of rounding on patients.

What are your thoughts on self-publishing?I love self-publishing. I love that it empowers authors to bring their product to market without having to pass through publishers who may have a gatekeeping and censoring effect. I also love that it changes the dynamic of what books make it to market. Publishing is a business, so to be profitable, publishers need to print and promote books it thinks will be commercially successful. But if you look through the catalogue of Smashwords or Lulu, it’s clear that many of their titles are labors of love, which would have no hope of commercial success, but whose authors are motivated by other considerations. That isn’t to say all those books are all well-written. Some of them are horrible, but that’s okay; you have to look through more “rough” to find the “diamonds” in self-publishing. The biggest benefit is probably narrow-appeal self-published titles… quirky and bizarre works, like the Smashwords book I found which tries to make a case that Paul McCartney was actually killed in 1966, and the performer we think is McCartney is actually an imposter. Also, of course, self-publishing has fueled a Renaissance in monster porn novella.

Any literary aspirations? I have no literary aspirations at this time.


Sunday, June 9, 2013

Claire DeWitt--mystery wrapped in a mystery

Claire DeWitt and the City of the Dead
Sara Gran
2011
Reviewed by Carol
5 stars


I was a little afraid to re-read this book, because the first time through was so absolutely stunning, it was as if it was written for me. My first review did not do justice to its wonderful combination of mystery, introspection, and setting, so I'm setting out to rectify it.

Claire DeWitt is a detective, willing to use all means necessary to solve the case for herself, because she knows sometimes the client doesn't want it solved:
"The client already knows the solution to his mystery. But he doesn't want to know. He doesn't hire a detective to solve his mystery. He hires a detective to prove that his mystery can't be solved."

Leon is a client who has requested her help finding his uncle Vic, a lawyer who disappeared during Hurricaine Katrina. He feels a little guilty: "'You know what it says in the Bible,' Leon said with resignation. 'Look out for thine uncle as you would thineself. Or whatever.'"

Claire tends to lie a little if it suits seeking solutions to a mystery, and isn't entirely honest about her history to Leon. "'How old are you?' 'Forty-two,' I said. I was thirty-five. But no one trusts a woman under forty. I'd started being forty when I was twenty-nine."

Claire's search brings her into contact with gangs of feral, forgotten children and with her own tumultous history as a detective, when she apprenticed in New Orleans. Claire frequently references a book by a famous detective (albeit fictional) whose thoughts on detecting are philosophical bon mots on mystery, truth, and humanity, as well as her history with Constance, her mentor. The time shifts flow smoothly and don't feel the intrusive into the story; in fact, they blended very well, sometimes foreshadowing the next development in the mystery. Claire's own mystery was worked in nicely, leaving a feel for her character but with a sense there is a lot more to discover.

As in many detective mysteries, setting plays a crucial role. One of the many small mysteries of the book is how Claire and the people of New Orleans never refer to Katrina by name, the way the rest of the country does. They call it a 'flood' and speak of it in terms of days ("'By Monday the phones were down and...' The rest of his sentence was obvious and he didn't say it out loud") or by location: being at the Superdome, Houston, back home. Claire notes the problem with locating people, phone numbers, addresses in post-Katrina New Orleans, and at least a couple of the locals involved in Claire's mystery are suffering from post-traumatic-stress disorder. Finding Vic means visiting some of the ravaged areas, and Gran's imagery is striking in its objectivity: 
"Signs with letter missing told the story: lots of OTELS and HOT BO LED CRA FISH and AWN SH PS. In the intermediate zone I started to see the marks spray-painted on houses: circles with X's through them, numbers and letters in the hollows of the X."

For those that are sensitive to it, there is proliferate drug use, but it is handled well. Without being judgmental, it is apparently an activity Claire engages in to self-medicate as well as bridge gaps between herself and other people. Interestingly, I thought Gran managed a nice balance between acknowledging the reasons for doing it at the same time showing the non-glamourous side.

I can't say enough about Gran's ability with language--my Kindle copy has highlights every few pages. The factual tone and dispassionate descriptions lend themselves to the creation of emotionally blunted characters, and yet somehow Gran manages to convey humanity, tragedy and humor. Claire's sarcasm came through loud and clear, but also her love and affection for those she admires. 

Gran has a lovely sense of balance, injecting small bon mots of sarcasm, absurdity and humor to leaven the emotional weight of the mystery and of the post-flood setting. Claire is very good at mocking herself as well as those that ignore the mysteries around them:
--"He looked like he was waiting to see a doctor about an unusual lump."

--"I concentrated on the goats. They were good company. They overlooked most of my personality defects and failures, my withdrawal of food from the fatties, and my inability to speak goat."

--"You don't know that," Mick said, weakly trying to fake liberal outrage.

--"Houses are like people, only less annoying."

--"I heard Mick roll his eyes over the phone."

Yet despite the humor, both Claire and Gran are very careful and compassionate with the hollow-eyed thin adolescents of New Orleans. I loved that finesse, the unwillingness to sacrifice a character or story to the villain prototype. The inclusion of the social-economic commentary elevates it beyond mere mystery to a meditation on humanity, all without sermonizing or being particularly heavy-handed. 


I highly recommend it.

An Ambiguous Utopia

The Dispossessed
Ursula K. Le Guin
Originally published 1974

Reviewed by Sesana
Four out of five stars

 Publisher Summary:
Centuries ago, the moon Anarres was settled by utopian anarchists who left the Earthlike planet Urras in search of a better world, a new beginning. Now a brilliant physicist, Shevek, determines to reunite the two civilizations that have been separated by hatred since long before he was born.

My Review:

The Dispossessed is Le Guin's view of an anarchist utopia. And yet, it isn't exceptionally creepy or too horribly far-fetched. That's because her utopia isn't a completely perfect society where everyone is equally happy. It's just better.

We see both Anarres (the anarchist society) and Urras (the not really veiled at all analog of America) through the eyes of Shevek, a particularly thoughtful scientist. He's a good narrator, because he is thoughtful and likeable, though flawed and usually naive. Sure, the plot is the weakest part of the book, but this seems to have been intended as the author's idea of how an anarchist society left to its own devices would fare after a century, and not as a plot-heavy work of SF. And because it is an unusually thoughtful novel of ideas, it did work for me. And, of course, beautifully written. Not many authors would take the time to add in a convincing love story, like the one between Shevek and his wife.

For me, and probably for a lot of other readers, what stuck with me about Anarres is not the perfection of the idea. That can come off as slightly creepy at the hands of some authors, when characters start to act like automatons. Le Guin resists that urge, and certainly put a lot of thought into how her society could be corrupted and dragged down by basic human nature. And yet, it's still better than the alternative. It's that thoughtfulness that makes this novel of ideas far, far less preachy than it could have been, and probably should have been.

The Forbes 25 Reviewers - #17 UniquelyMoi *Dhestiny* BlithelyBookish

Today's guest is UniquelyMoi *Dhestiny* BlithelyBookish.  She also posts at Blithely Bookish.

How did you discover Goodreads?
Fate? Destiny? Divine intervention? I honestly can’t remember, but it’s been one of the most awesome experiences of my life. I’ve met many amazing people – readers who share my love of books, authors whose words have gotten me through some difficult times, and friends who have touched my life and blessed me in more ways than I can express.

What have been your most memorable Goodreads experiences?
Oh, there are so many memorable experiences! As I said, I’ve made some wonderful friends, friends I’d have never otherwise had the chance to meet, had it not been for Goodreads. But, one of the single most exciting and unexpected things to happen was finding myself on the pages of Forbes Magazine. I mean, seriously? How many people can say they’ve had that experience!?!

Name one reviewer not in the Forbes 25 that people should be aware of.
I can’t. There are simply too many to narrow it down to one, or even one dozen, and there are many others who I feel were more deserving of the mention than myself. The thing is, everyone expresses themselves differently, so reviewers I find amazing, others might find lacking. And the genre being reviewed will determine who I look to. My favorite historical romance reviewers are not my favorite paranormal romance reviewers. The ones I go to for reviews on contemporary romance novels are not the ones whose reviews I’d look for on a romantic suspense novel… I hope this makes sense. So while I’d love to answer your question and name just one, I can’t.

What was your initial reaction to Amazon buying Goodreads?
My first reaction? I groaned (seriously, I groaned) and thought, Nothing good can come of this… That said, I’m keeping an open mind and hoping for the best. One thing is for certain, the Goodreads I joined back in 2008 is not the Goodreads of today. Times are changing and so it’s inevitable that things will change, too, and not always for the best. I don’t know if we, the general membership of Goodreads, have been given all the details of the Amazon deal, so it’s hard to shape an informed opinion. Again, I’m hoping for the best, but only time will tell.

How many books do you own?
I own literally hundreds of paperbacks. At least 300, probably closer to 400. However, I’ve only read about 25% of them. Ebooks? Thousands. Seriously. On Amazon alone my Kindle Library boasts 2,916 books, most being freebies or gifts from friends, family, authors and publishers. Frankly, I think the price charged for ebooks is outrageous and I only purchase ebooks from favorite authors, or books in a series I MUST read. And speaking of ebooks, did you know that according to Amazon, when you buy a book from them, you haven’t actually bought it, you’ve only leased it. And to make matters worse, according to them, they can remove from your account any book they wish, without issuing a refund of the money you paid for said book? I’d like to see them try to get inside my house and “remove” any print book I purchased from them. Five words; The Right to Bear Arms.
Just sayin’…

Who is your favorite author?
I have to pick one? Surely you jest! Well, I can break it down by genre: Romantic Suspense would be Pamela Clare. Paranormal Romance; J.R.Ward. Contemporary Romance; Kristen Ashley, Jill Shalvis, Shannon Stacey, and Bella Andre. Erotica; Cherise Sinclair and Sophie Oak. Historical Romance is the hardest to choose from because as a whole it’s so diverse that I simply cannot name a single author for the entire genre or its sub-genres. That would be like asking me to compare cotton to kumquats! Or something akin to that. But here goes: Pamela Clare (yes, again), Eloisa James, Lisa Kleypas, Sarah MacLean, Loretta Chase, Anna Campbell, Courtney Milan, Victoria Vane, Lorraine Heath… wait! Don’t cut me off! I’m not done yet…

What is your favorite book of all time?
Oh, again with the difficult questions… you must be a sadist! Okay, I’d say my favorite book of all time is the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Yes, I know that’s three books, but really, it’s one story, so whatever.

What are your thoughts on ebooks?
Love them! With, of course, the exception of the outrageous prices and that totally lame “lease” rule. Not cool!

What are your thoughts on self-publishing?
It’s been a blessing and a curse.

THE BLESSING: Some of my favorite authors are self published, and I’m thrilled for them because they pocket a whole lot more $$ for their work than do the authors represented by the big name publishers. And, self published authors tend to price their books more reasonably, which makes me, as a consumer, very happy.

THE CURSE: Self publishing makes it easy for ‘anyone’ to write a book, and ‘anyone’ does. Sadly, many of those books are poorly edited, or the stories not thought out at all. These would be authors are giving self publishing a bad name. If they’d slow down and not be in such a rush to publish, but instead took the time to have someone read their work before putting it out there for the general reading population, they’d have a better chance at success. Plus, I know many people who will no longer read self published works because they're tired of having to wade through the muck to get to the good stuff.

Any literary aspirations?
No. Well, yes. Okay, honestly? I don’t know. I’ve got two stories I’m working on. For me, writing started out as a therapy, of sorts. As a way to safely express my own thoughts, feelings, and experiences through my characters, and giving them the resolutions to life issues I haven't yet attained for myself. It really did start out as a ‘just for me’ thing, but I shared a bit of my stories with a few people and they seem to think I should continue on and consider publishing them. So we'll see. I wish I had the faith in myself that they have in me.

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Wayward girls way more compelling than girls that shine

The Longings of Wayward Girls
Karen Brown
Washington Square Press
Available July 2, 2013
$15.00 List Price

 

Rated 4 out of 5 stars
Reviewer: Trudi


There's a buzz book for the summer - you might have heard of it already -- The Shining Girls by Lauren Beukes. Featuring a time traveling serial killer, it has huge potential for a beach read thriller, but I don't know. Despite enjoying the main character, I felt it was missing something and my overall reaction after reading it was lukewarm.

This book on the other hand is much more to my liking. Probably closer to three and a half stars, it's an easy four in my books because it features all the elements I adore -- suburban New England setting, family secrets and lies, prepubescent girls doing naughty things with tragic consequence. It's an "all grown up and looking back" story as the adult tries to untangle the mysterious events of a dark childhood summer. It's a dual narrative that flips back and forth in time -- from the summer of 1979 to the summer of 2003. There's mood and atmosphere and dread and intrigue. It's a voyeuristic look into the oft-twisted and inappropriate shenanigans of life in the 'burbs.

Sadie is a pushy, bratty kid, with razor sharp smarts and a vivid imagination that's only going to get her into trouble. Her mother is a domineering, manic depressive drunk who isn't going to be there for Sadie when she needs her the most. Out of boredom and as an act of rebellion, Sadie hatches an elaborate ruse to amuse herself and her best friend. It's the summer of 1979 and her victim is the neighborhood outcast, a young girl with a miserable home life. The consequences of this cruel prank will have a tragic ripple effect.

Sadie grows up. The memory of that time is locked away in a deep, dark corner of her mind. She has a husband and two beautiful children. But sorrow has found Sadie. She is grieving her miscarriage and in this vulnerable state, back walks the boy she crushed on as a young girl. He's all grown up and stirring up more than the overwhelming sexual attraction she feels for him. Sadie begins to think about that summer long ago, seeking truth to all the unanswered questions she's lived with her entire life.

For a debut novel, The Longings of Wayward Girls (great title) shows a lot of promise. In the best ways, I was reminded of Megan Abbott's The End of Everything, and Gillian Flynn's Sharp Objects. Author Karen Brown is on my radar and I will definitely be seeking out more of her writing.

This review also appears on Goodreads.

Chris F. Holm Is Ready to Collect Your Soul!

Next month, Chris F. Holm is set to supply his third entry in his Collector series with THE BIG REAP. On the heels of that release, I thought I would share some thoughts on the first two installments, Dead Harvest and The Wrong Goodbye!

Dead Harvest
Dead Harvest
Chris F. Holm
Angry Robot Books
Available Now!

Sam is a collector.  A collector of souls!  You see, Sam’s wife had contracted a strain of TB and in a moment of desperation, Sam accepted a sketchy employment opportunity from a gentleman named Dumas.  While Dumas promised a complete recovery on the part of Sam’s wife, he remained closed mouth on the true nature of his employment.  Unfortunately for many, deals of this nature are extremely short sighted and if Sam possessed the foresight to know what his future would entail, he may have taken a little more time to come to his decision.

Dead Harvest is what you get when you fill a casserole dish with equal parts detective noir, supernatural sci-fi, cover it with some snappy dialogue, pop it in the oven and broil the shit out of it. What you get is a recipe that will not only satisfy your palate but leave you hungry for more.

I feel like Chris Holm had some excellent ideas here and you can tell he was influenced by some similar work that came before him (Hellblazer comics, Supernatural TV series, ). While I enjoyed the first installment in what looks to be a lengthy series, I’m more so excited of what’s to potentially come. I’d like to think Holm can take what he’s established here and build upon it, giving us a more complete picture of this world he’s created. It’s not too often that I walk away from a debut novel with such anticipation for future books.

While I more or less enjoyed this, it did occasionally dip into some cliche plot devices that took away a little of what made the tale unique. I didn't much care for the back story in how he was collected, I feel like Holm could have put a much more compelling spin on it. Luckily, the mythos that the author put in place regarding Sam’s job kept things interesting as the story moved forward.

I’m really digging Angry Robot so far. This is the second book I've devoured that they've published and if this is par for the course for what they’re releasing, I may have stumbled upon a cornucopia of entertainment. They certainly have some smart people over there – stay golden, pony boy.

*Oh, and there’s a nod to Lawrence Block.
A few rooms in, a uniformed cop sat slouched beside an open door, his nose buried in a Scudder novel.


The Wrong Goodbye
The Wrong Goodbye
Chris F. Holm
Angry Robot Books
Available Now!

Following Dead Harvest, what do you give the guy who nearly brought upon the apocalypse?  Why, a second chance of course!

Sam Thornton is tasked with the collection of a soul belonging to a feared drug lord.  Following a meeting with an old friend and fellow collector, the soul Sam had acquired goes missing; replaced with that of another.  The search for his stolen property takes Sam in unexpected directions as well as providing unwanted attention from those he’d like to avoid.  As Sam’s journey continues, the window for retrieving the soul starts to close and his opportunity to stop yet another potential apocalyptic event becomes less and less likely.

If you read my review, you’d already be aware of how much I enjoyed Dead Harvest.  When I was told the sequel – The Wrong Goodbye – was just as good, if not better, you couldn't hold me back from picking it up.

With The Wrong Goodbye, I feel like the series gained a lot of ground in terms of Sam’s development.  Sam laments about being stuck in his role as a collector but doesn't whine and mope about it.  He knows that he’ll always have Lillith down his neck and with the added pressure of those who granted him a reprieve following his actions in book one, he knows he can’t afford to make a mistake.  Despite these factors that he must always be mindful of, you never feel like he loses any of what makes him a great character.  He’s still a smart-ass and he still lets his darker, more comedic side come out to play.  In fact, there’s this:

“He slammed me into the rock wall behind me.  My head hit so hard I thought I’d puke.  Then I did puke, so, you know, yay for being right.”

As a Collector, the path laid out before him is only wide enough for one person.  People may drift in and out of his life but given the nature of his employment, they’re never around for long.  Given his circumstances, you could grab the low hanging fruit and fill Sam’s attitude with gloom and doom but it’s really important to make him an interesting and entertaining character by mixing it up a bit.

There’s a scene where Sam and his sidekick, Gio, are traveling in a stolen vehicle.  Gio brings up the past and asks Sam about his wife.  Sam’s response, tightening his grip around the steering wheel and thinking twice about dragging his history out, reinforces why despite his witty remarks and snappy dialogue, at his core he’ll always be a tragic figure.  Thornton has the rest of eternity to wonder if the choice he made was the right one; something that will most likely never be easier for him to deal with.

Overall, I feel like this series is only getting stronger.  The third book is due out this summer and again, has a fantastic cover.  One thing I believe I didn't speak about in my review for Dead Harvest was it’s excellent cover art.  The designs provided by Amazing 15 continues a trend of vintage-style artwork.

Check out my interview with Chris over @ Every Read Thing.

The Forbes 25 Reviewers - #18 Ceridwen

Today's guest is Ceridwen.  Ceridwen also posts at Readerling.


How did you discover Goodreads?
An irl friend sent me a link in April of 2008, which means I've been active on Goodreads for five years now. I didn't interact much at first – I had no experience with social media; facebook would come later for me – but very slowly accrued friends other than my mother, husband, and a smattering of real life friends. As an introduction to social media, it was a kind experience, as the early-ish days of Goodreads had a sort of backwater enthusiast vibe, and you could be reasonably sure that no one at all was paying attention, which suited me fine.

What have been your most memorable Goodreads experiences?
That's hard to say. There have been some memorable scandals, trollings, call-outs, and cat-fights that have occurred on Goodreads which were fun for me. I can think of a dozen instances where pointless and/or stupid trolling turned into runaway threads full of humor, lolcats, and, you know, profound commentary on books. My personal favorite was the time one of my reviews got trolled by a fine young man from Texas with a penchant for dismissing people as “ugly lesbians”. I still get comments on that clusterfuck of a thread wondering what the hell happened.

Though I haven't been involved in much of this, except as an observer, I find the various author/reviewer meltdowns that occur pretty fascinating. Goodreads is a focal point for two different trends: self-publishing and citizen reviewing. So you have two different kinds of folk running up against each other – people who don't know shit about marketing running up against sometimes harshly stated opinions – and the result can be explosive. And I really shouldn't be singling out the self-pubs, because a fair number of these explosions have happened between Big Six authors (or their agents or friends) and their readers. As the industry changes from more mediated relationships – authors are largely left to their own devices these days (I am given to understand) – the potential for conflict approaches one.

I don't have any easy answers for this, and I don't think either reviewers or authors have gotten it right 100% of the time. I believe there is a tendency for reviewers to be rewarded for strong reactions – when I sort my reviews by the ones with the most votes, the first ten are either five-starred or one-starred reviews, hatchet jobs or soaring praise. I get it: we respond strongly to strong emotion, and I don't think there is anything wrong or bad about that. I worry sometimes about this feedback loop though, at least as it pertains to the critical process. I mean, no one ever said that a citizen review had to be a measured intellectual endeavor, and god bless all the goofing, irreverent, parodic, cheerfully off-topic reviews out there, but I still worry about the middle-voice, the three-starrer that gets lost in the wash. Heated rhetoric is rewarded – and I'm not saying I'm immune to this, having penned some hatchet jobs and love-fests myself – but sometimes I wonder what reviews would look like if it weren't. I certainly think about this when I reach for the hatchet.

Name one reviewer not in the Forbes 25 that people should be aware of.
Just one? This question sucks. How about 25? In no particular order:

Eric from Minneapolis
Matt from Nebraska
Miriam from California
Ben Babcock
Paquita Maria Sanchez
Mike Reynolds
Monica!
Caris O'Malley
Michael Springer, who has some terrible pseudonym these days
Dead Flamingo Jessica
Sparrow
Joel from Chicago
Jacob Ford
Terence from California 
Moira Russell
Lisa Vegan
Abigail A. 
Kelly from I don't know where
Aerin from Seattle 
Flannery
RandomAnthony
Jason Morais
Lightreads
My Flesh Sings Out aka Josh
oriana from Brooklyn
Wealhtheow Wylfing

This might be more than 25, and I could add more. I <3 a lot of reviewers on Goodreads.

What was your initial reaction to Amazon buying Goodreads?
Zombie apocalypse? No, really, I think it was inevitable that Goodreads was going to sell out or go public, because the problem of monetizing any start-up for the founders. CEO Otis was looking to cash out on a very good idea executed (mostly) well, and I can't say I blame him. Plus, Goodreads just hit some kind of tipping point with user numbers – 10+ million and counting - and I don't think Goodreads has been able to cope in terms of capital or infrastructure. (Witness the complete failure of the notification system on a regular basis, and less important problems like their inability to update top lists for months.) After facebook went public to not disastrous, but not fantastic results, that left selling out. I am hugely disappointed that it turned out to be Amazon, but I'm also not hugely surprised.

Amazon has created a problem for themselves with the discoverability issue – as the bricks and mortar bookstores shutter, there's no place for serendipitous browsing, and their “if you'll like this, then” algorithms are probably the best out there, but that doesn't mean they're good. Plus, Amazon reviews are heavily gamed by all kinds of competing forces – authors and/or fans with grudges, a downvoting system that tends to punish outlying opinions or perspectives, payola scandals, even Michael Jackson fans gone insane. As product reviews not personal responses, the personal gets lost. The social network aspect of Goodreads solves their discoverability issue and the issue of confidence in the review. We goodreaders are now all the person inside the Mechanical Turk. Which sucks. Maybe there's no difference in shaking my ass for CEOtis or Amazon, but it feels different.

How many books do you own?
A quick estimate using my thumb puts the number at about 750, but that's not factoring the stuff in the basement or the kids books. So probably a thousand. I like books, as objects, but I tend to give them away when I love them, and I seldom re-read.

Who is your favorite author?
Ursula K Le Guin

What is your favorite book of all time?
Fail. Impossible to compute.

What are your thoughts on ebooks?
I adore paper, and there are things that are impossible to do with a screen that you can do with a physical object, but ebooks have their place. I read a lot of pulp mass market stuff, because I can put down several throw-away fictions while I'm reading something more considered. It's almost required, because I'm a pleasure reader primarily, and while I get pleasure from smart stuff, it requires a level of engagement that I can't give it just before bed or on a Sunday afternoon or whatever. So an ebook that I can half-assedly download from the library and pick at can be really perfect.

I'm not hugely excited about all the proprietary readers out there – Nook, Kindle, Kobo, whatever – which lock readers into a specific distribution channel. I don't think that's good for publishing, but I don't know what the solution is.

What are your thoughts on self-publishing?
Boy, what a thing. Obviously, publishing is in a huge upheaval at the moment, much like music was ten years ago, but I don't think we can necessarily extrapolate what happened to music distribution to book publishing. So many of the arts have fractured into the long tail – a series of sub-sub-sub-genres catering to very, very specific readerships. Which can be great for those specific readerships, but if you're not in them, maybe hard to figure out. I am absolutely game to read self-published works, and I have read and enjoyed a number, but I do admit I worry about the editorial process, and, given some of the meltdowns I've seen, the insulating effect of the publisher when authors and readers interact.

We could all use an editor – as I'm fiercely aware of when I post some damn review riddled with typos and badly connected thoughts. Platforms like Goodreads become all the more important when sorting through self-published works, which are rarely reviewed on traditional platforms – even the mid-list gets lost, and if you're talking about genre fiction, forget it – which is why the Amazon takeover continues to worry me. The difference between product review and criticism is vital.

Any literary aspirations? 
Sure.

Got to watch an artist with an attitude....

Reviewed by Stephanie
4 out of 5 stars


Victoria McQueen is a badass artist with a badass talent that goes beyond her artistic abilities. She has the ability to cross any distance with her 'shorter way' bridge to locate missing things.  The bridge comes into existence with the combination of her strong, creative mind and transportation, not just any transportation, but a vehicle that chooses her; a Raleigh Tuff Burner in her youth and a Triumph motorcycle in adult years. It's magic, and all magic has it's price. 

Victoria finds she's not the only person in the world with special talents similar to hers, she finds two others, Maggie Leigh who can find answers to questions by the use of scrabble tiles and Charlie Manx who travels in a Rolls Royce Wraith that can transport him to other dimensions in a world of his own creation.....his creation is called Christmas-land, where it's the happiest time of the year all year round (for Manx anyway.)

What good is an amusement park called Christmas Land if there are no children to fill it? None.  So Manx goes about the country in his magic car kidnapping children, for their own good he believes,(what child wouldn't want to live in a place where it's Christmas day everyday?) with his sidekick, Bing.  Bing doesn't have any special abilities other then being uber creepy.....seriously, he's the true stuff of nightmares.

One day Charlie Manx crosses Victoria McQueen and that is where the fun begins.....fasten your seat belts, keep hands inside the ride at all times, and for goodness sake don't get out of the car until the ride has come to a complete stop.

I grew up in the town that has the BEST amusement park in the U.S. and most likely the world.  I got a job there as an artist as a youngster, and then continued to work in many parks all over the country for twenty plus years.  So this book has much that appeals to me.

I always found amusement parks to have an underlying creepy factor, especially after close and all the rides have shut down, the shops have closed and it's quiet.  Being a manager I would have to stay later than most on occasion, and trust me, it was a speedy walk to the car on those nights.  I like that Joe Hill has touched on this, but I feel he's just taped a well that could go much deeper. 

NOS4A2 is filled with memorable characters (my favorite being Lou, Victoria's baby daddy) and I hope to spend some more time with them in the future.

I listened to the audio book and I have to say Kate Mulgrew did a fantastic job!  A book can be ruined by a bad performer and made even better by a really good one. It also made me smile when he gave a shout out to Firefly and threw out a few references to some worlds his dad has created. 

As seen on Goodreads

Some cold reality

Reviewed by Stephanie
4 out of 5 stars




Turns out everyone thinks they are somehow smarter than the people around them, everyone.  We all are guilty of it.  We walk into a Wal-mart, take a look around us and think “what a bunch of freaks, and always in Wal-mart” …..But we are also in Wal-mart as we make this judgment.  I don’t go into that store unless they are the only option, but every time I look around and I think to myself “do I also look like a freak by just entering this store, then magically go back to normal when I leave?”
I once thought that I had free will and nothing that Sam Harris wrote proved otherwise, but David McRaney may have done just that.  Nothing we do as humans have anything to do with individual choice.  We are all manipulated by the media and a bunch of biases and fallacies.

Here are a couple of examples of this…….

Confirmation Bias

The Misconception: Your opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis.

The Truth: Your opinions are the result of years of paying attention to information which confirmed what you believed while ignoring information which challenged your preconceived notions.

So, this wasn’t news to me.  I am not ever going to watch Faux News for any reason, unless I had a job that forced me to do it.  Skeeter, down the street would rather eat an arugula salad before watching Rachel Maddow for ten seconds.   We are only going to pay attention to the things that confirm our beliefs……this explains the existents of Rush Limbaugh.  That being said, I’m right and Skeeter is not.

Extinction Burst

The Misconception: If you stop engaging in a bad habit, the habit will gradually diminish until it disappears from your life.

The Truth: Any time you quit something cold turkey, your brain will make a last-ditch effort to return you to your habit.”

Yeah, anyone who has dieted (most probably everyone, unless you are one of those skinny people who “just can’t seem to gain weight”…..everyone hates you) has experienced this.  You are going along well, you are hitting your goals….you hit a plateau or life gets in the way and you break from the diet a little.  Before you know it you are back to eating the stuff you really shouldn’t.  This is due to the ‘extinction burst’.  Food tastes good, some food tastes better than others and since we evolved to survive we are hard wired to crave high calorie food because that is what determined life or death.  Ironically, that’s what’s killing us today.   When a reward is taken away from us, we throw a fit…….but if we still don’t get the reward we give up.  That’s why you never give in to a two year old during an extinction burst.

The Just-World Fallacy

The Misconception: People who are losing at the game of life must have done something to deserve it.

The Truth: The beneficiaries of good fortune often do nothing to earn it, and bad people often get away with their actions without consequences”

This is a big one.  All those people who believe that poor people are poor because they want to be and/or are not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps because they just want to live easy off the system and have no idea how to work hard, these people are fooled by this fallacy.  Never, do they take into account their own fortunate beginnings as the reason they themselves are not amongst the poor.  The reason they are not poor is not only because they worked really hard (I’m not saying they didn’t work hard, and that is a big part of sucess), but they are not poor because they didn’t come from poor most likely.  Many people have risen above their poor beginnings (Ben Franklin) but it’s a very hard cycle to overcome.

Those who have a hard time overcoming this may have this fallacy to blame……

Learned Helplessness

The Misconception: If you are in a bad situation, you will do whatever you can do to escape it.

The Truth: If you feel like you aren’t in control of your destiny, you will give up and accept whatever situation you are in.”

This is all about having some control in your life.  If all choice is taken away from a person they tend to give up.  Residents in nursing homes do better if they get to choose how to arrange their furniture than those who have everything done for them.  If you are living in a bad situation and you don’t have any control over what happens to you, you don’t have access to higher education because it is financially out of reach.  No one will give you a job no matter how hard you try because you aren’t dressed nice enough, and you don’t have enough education…….these people will accept their situation most likely than not.

This book was very interesting.  But I’m feeling a little down because I learned that I am not so smart and I am not that special.

Thanks David for the depression…..*sigh*

All kidding aside, I really enjoyed this book.  Here’s a website if you would like to read more.

You are not so smart


As seen on goodreads